On Mon, 2020-12-07 at 16:15 +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
Hi, On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 02:37:57PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
Hi, since we're dropping phone specific package for byzantium we also ought to drop `+librem5.X' in the version numbers. Matthias, what would you suggest here so that we generate higher version numbers in byzantium when backporting a package to both amber and byzantium to be consistent whith the rest of PureOS but also have a higher number than the current
<upstream>-<debian-rev)pureos+librem5.<revision>
For the time being addin `+byzN` at the end of the version number will do:
1.0-2pureos+librem5+byzN
For new upstream versions we can drop the librem5 postfix since there's no difference between laptop and phone and we can do
1.0-2pureosN
for byzantium¹ and
1.0-2pureosN~amberM
for amber (when backporting the byzantium version to amber).
Does that make sense?
I think it does make sense Guido. I ought to have replied sooner, but I don't think that there's much I can add to the discussion since I think this follows our versioning scheme as documented. In fact I'm going to add this information to that document unless Matthias has any objections.
Regards,
Jeremiah
Cheers, -- Guido
- according to
https://tracker.pureos.net/w/development/packaging_overview/
Cheers, -- Guido
PureOS-project mailing list PureOS-project@lists.puri.sm https://lists.puri.sm/listinfo/pureos-project