Hello Guido,
Am 06.10.21 um 14:44 schrieb Guido Günther:
So why I'm posting here? Simply because there is no target branch on the destination tree I can
Wouldn't a branch `pureos/latest` at the same commit as Debian's 2.93 be the target branch to create an MR against? Similar to what happened for seahorse and lollypop? Why wouldn't that work?
of course that would work too.
It's a small diff and i don't want to complicate things, just trying to figure out where default workflows break.
I've currently decided against this option because to keep the existing old history within the same tree as base for the current new added branch.
I think currently it makes no difference if we would stay on the current created pureos/latest branch. If you all think it would make more sense to branch away pureos/latest starting from the relevant tag 2.93 I'll can rework the trees. That's why I've posted here, to get a common opinion on how to proceed.
Hallo!
On 10/6/21 10:28 AM, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
Hello Guido,
Am 06.10.21 um 14:44 schrieb Guido Günther:
So why I'm posting here?
I appreciate your communication style Carsten - it's useful to discuss these points collaboratively.
Simply because there is no target branch on the destination tree I can
Wouldn't a branch `pureos/latest` at the same commit as Debian's 2.93 be the target branch to create an MR against? Similar to what happened for seahorse and lollypop? Why wouldn't that work?
of course that would work too.
It's a small diff and i don't want to complicate things, just trying to figure out where default workflows break.
I've currently decided against this option because to keep the existing old history within the same tree as base for the current new added branch.
I think currently it makes no difference if we would stay on the current created pureos/latest branch. If you all think it would make more sense to branch away pureos/latest starting from the relevant tag 2.93 I'll can rework the trees. That's why I've posted here, to get a common opinion on how to proceed.
In this case I'm not familiar enough with the specifics to have a strong opinion but will rely on your common sense and Guido's guidance.
Regards,
Jeremiah